Hollywood Liberal takes boot off throat of the Little People...

...after 22 years of stalling and excuses, then sends electronic Pinkertons and beefy thugs to threaten and harass the Little People if they don't stay in their place...all fine, long-standing Democrat tradition here in the early 21st century. Barbara Streissand got nuthin' on David Geffen.

Senator McCain has no principle!...

...How could this law professor have forgot that McCain left his principle with Charles Keating YEARS ago?...and then we all paid to bail out the banking system. Old people in CA lost their life savings and McClown goes on to be buttboy of Big Media and Sens. Dodd and Kennedy...setting up more of us to pay for his vanity and weak mind. He is, increasingly, the Republicans' Al Gore.

The New Tyrants

"Notice that the anti-democratic streak grows more and more pronounced in the American elite. Last year this anti-democratic streak was seen in its gravitation toward non-American, utterly unaccountable institutions like the United Nations and the World Court as useful vehicles with which to overpower American majority views. The less support the elite could find democratically, the more they turned for support to undemocratic international institutions."

Their stupidity may be measured the fact that they venerate a patrician prettyboy (Senator Warner-Taylor) and a Klansman (and filibusterer of the 1963 Civil Rights Act) as sages.

Read the essay here.

Democrats = the essence of bigotry

A very good essay by Thomas Sowell.

Saddam threw live people into a people-sized woodchipper...

...and it's "disgusting" that there are photos of him in his undies?!! These people need to get a life...or, at least, have some actual life intrude into their Soma-tized existences.

Keep drinkin' that kool-aid all of you who have anything other than contempt for that butcher. Likely, you all would have fawned over Hitler, too.

Then, again, we might consider...

...the Newsweek Lied/People Died scandal from another perspective.

American Press Lied. People Died.

From Belmont Club here on Blogger:

The Agent 2

The Drudgereport carried a report of this strangely shrill exchange at a press briefing between Bush spokesman Scott McClellan and reporters. The words in the exchange are important, but not nearly as significant as the atmospherics which evoke Edvard Munch's The Scream.

Q With respect, who made you the editor of Newsweek? Do you think it's appropriate for you, at that podium, speaking with the authority of the President of the United States, to tell an American magazine what they should print?

MR. McCLELLAN: I'm not telling them. I'm saying that we would encourage them to help --

Q You're pressuring them.

MR. McCLELLAN: No, I'm saying that we would encourage them --

Q It's not pressure?

MR. McCLELLAN: Look, this report caused serious damage to the image of the United States abroad. And Newsweek has said that they got it wrong. I think Newsweek recognizes the responsibility they have. We appreciate the step that they took by retracting the story. Now we would encourage them to move forward and do all that they can to help repair the damage that has been done by this report. And that's all I'm saying. But, no, you're absolutely right, it's not my position to get into telling people what they can and cannot report....

Q Are you asking them to write a story about how great the American military is; is that what you're saying here?

MR. McCLELLAN: Elisabeth, let me finish my sentence. Our military --

Q You've already said what you're -- I know what -- how it ends.

MR. McCLELLAN: No, I'm coming to your question, and you're not letting me have a chance to respond. But our military goes out of their way to handle the Koran with care and respect. There are policies and practices that are in place. This report was wrong. Newsweek, itself, stated that it was wrong. And so now I think it's incumbent and -- incumbent upon Newsweek to do their part to help repair the damage. And they can do that through ways that they see best, but one way that would be good would be to point out what the policies and practices are in that part of the world, because it's in that region where this report has been exploited and used to cause lasting damage to the image of the United States of America. It has had serious consequences. And so that's all I'm saying, is that we would encourage them to take steps to help repair the damage. And I think that they recognize the importance of doing that. That's all I'm saying.

Q As far as the Newsweek article is concerned, first, how and where the story came from? And do you think somebody can investigate if it really happened at the base, and who told Newsweek? Because somebody wrote a story.

The resentment is palpable. Not the resentment of the spokesman of a Commander in Chief of a military vilified in an article that has already been retracted, but the resentment of reporters whose prerogatives have been questioned. "With respect, who made you the editor of Newsweek?", one asks. McClellan actually cannot finish a sentence in answer, because one of the prerogatives of this particular reporter is to ask the questions. "You've already said what you're -- I know what -- how it ends." And the question, although put in different words each time, is monomanaically the same: when did you stop beating your wife? "As far as the Newsweek article is concerned, first, how and where the story came from? And do you think somebody can investigate if it really happened at the base, and who told Newsweek? Because somebody wrote a story." And because "somebody wrote a story" the presumption was that the story had to be true, the retraction notwithstanding, as if it never existed, as if the retraction were completely irrelevant from the discussion. In a sense it is, because there was never a retraction. There may have been words which resembled a retraction, but it was never, ever really made because it is absolutely impossible to ever make it.

posted by wretchard

Conveniently forgetting the desecration of the Church of the Nativity 2

'When asked about Michael Isikoff’s charges, Pentagon spokesman Lawrence DiRita inquired of his interviewer, “People are dead because of what this son of a bitch said. How could he be credible now?”'

Isikoff has always been a smarmy leftist turd, anyway. The families of those killed should sue Newsweek and him. Given the demonstrated lack of credibility and reckless disregard for the truth, all Newsweek credentials with the DoD should be suspended.

Conveniently forgetting the desecration of the Church of the Nativity by Palestinian Muslims...

...the theological dirtbags in the last 3 paragraphs threaten our lives again...their hypocrisy is more proof of their dishonesty and wicked intent.

But...but...fallacious and fraudulent...

...thy name be Democratic Party, the party of plagarists (Biden), mashers (Clinton, Condon, Dodd, Kennedy[s]), Klansmen (Byrd) and murderers (Condon [?], Kennedy, T)...all sucking up to and massaging any ignorance or fear they can find or create. The Robber Barons had nothing on these people and their cohorts in management of Big Labor, in Big Education, in Big Media and in the Hollywood elite.

Bridgestone...

sucks.